Web(See Grant v. Plumbers (Pty) Ltd. 1949 (2) S.A. 470) In the present case the applicant has shown that it never. 6. filed a notice of intention to defend the action because the summons was duly served upon the the applicant. Thereafter it was delivered to its attorneys. Unfortunately it never reached the attorney of record WebJun 12, 2024 · In Leweis v Sampoio 2000 NR 186 (SC) at 191G-H this Court approved the following content given to the requirements implied by that phrase in Grant v Plumbers (Pty) Ltd, 1949(2) SA 470 (0) at 476-477: “ (a) He must give a reasonable explanation of his default. If it appears that his default was willful or that it was due to gross negligence ...
Transnamib Holdings Ltd v Bernhardt Garoëb (SA 26/2003) …
WebGrant v Plumbers (Pty) Ltd 1949 (2) SA 470 (O) at 476 - 477 and can be summarised as follows: 6.1 The applicant for rescission must give a reasonable explanation for his … Web1999 (4) SA p BLIEDEN J 'In Grant v Plumbers (Pty) Ltd 1949 (2) SA 470 (O) Brink J, in dealing with a similar provision, held (at 476) that in order to show good cause an applicant should comply with the following requirements: ... eagle with snake tattoo
Lewies v Sampoio (SA 4 of 1998) [2000] NASC 1 (22 August 2000…
WebGrant v Plumbers (Pty) Ltd 1949 (2) SA 470 (O) at 476: - 3 Requirements. Must provide a reasonable explanation for default Application must be brought bona fide Must establish … Websubmission Counsel cited Grant v Plumbers (Pty) Ltd 1949(2) SA 470 at 474 which was concerned with the question of presence of or effect of "just cause" in applications to set aside a default judgment where failure had been " entirely due to the negligence of appellant's attorney". For the first submission (good explanation), Counsel cited ... http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAECMHC/2015/74.pdf eagle with sunglasses