Webparagraph 22 of the NPPF. The “no reasonable prospect” test should be applied by Authorities in the review of their plans to assess whether existing allocated land should be carried forward. That process forms part of this Local Plan. Allocations in the plan will then result from that work. The relevant and appropriate criterion for development Web26 jul. 2024 · 3. The new NPPF is not a complete change of direction. Rather it makes clearer the obligations relating to the two parts of planning. Firstly, it brings clarity to the Local Plan Making process. It guides, in greater detail, how Local Planning Authority Planners should take responsibility for the future planning of their authority area.
WebIntroduction The 24th July saw the long-awaited publication of the Government's revised National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). This is the first revision since it was originally published in 2012. The NPPF is the over-arching planning document for England and Wales and sets out how development plans should be prepared by Local Planning Authorities … WebConservation area designation introduces a general control over the demolition of unlisted buildings and provides a basis for planning policies whose objective is to conserve all aspects of character or appearance, including landscape and public spaces, that define an area’s special interest. There are approximately 10,000 conservation areas ... homthreads shams
OPDC POST SUBMISSION MODIFIED DRAFT LOCAL PLAN
WebNational Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) and Heritage Assets. The government has set out its planning policies for the historic environment and our heritage assets in the NPPF (ref. 1). The government published its Planning Practice Guidance in March 2014 and keeps it updated as appropriate. Both the NPPF and the Planning Practice Guidance are ... Webindicates the need to apply the Exception Test (as set out in the National Planning Policy Framework), the scope of a Strategic Flood Risk Assessment will be widened to consider … Web9 apr. 2024 · The grounds before her were as follows: “ Ground 1: Harm to heritage assets. The Planning Inspector and Minister applied the wrong legal test to the issue of whether there will be ‘substantial harm’ to the heritage assets within the Gardens. The correct application of the test would have led inevitably to the conclusion that the harm to ... historically what did a fire mark indicate